RACISIM, SECTARIANISM AND HEALTH OUTCOMES

on Monday, 27 July 2020.

Dear Colleagues,

This discussion is trending today. How can we use this debate to improve health outcomes for all?

The current global debate on racism provides an opportunity to discuss the contribution of racism and other forms of sectarianism to population health outcomes. The WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health and other studies have pointed out racial discrimination as a key social determinant and driver of racial health inequities. This is mediated by direct and indirect pathways such as differential access to societal resources, education, employment and living conditions.

The world has been gripped by the reaction of disgust expressed through widespread global protests in over 60 countries against the killing of Floyd George a black man by a white policeman in Minneapolis, USA. This incident took place in broad daylight and was vividly captured in a live video recording that went viral and touched the hearts of many around the world. This global reaction is a vivid illustration of our humanity at work where we feel the pain of another human being and respond to stop the same from happening again to others. It is this humanity that has enabled our species homo sapiens to collaborate, learn together and prosper by turning planetary resources to our advantage.

However, we also have innate in us the tendency to promote self, kith and kin and other communities which are the building blocks of society. There are legitimate reasons for ‘birds of the same feather to flock together” as communities and when well managed; within defined boundaries and limits this has benefits for the overall common good and should be encouraged. These boundaries get breached when greed by individual and group self-benefit override and do harm to the overall societal common good. This becomes discrimination and constitutes the vices of racism, tribalism, nepotism and other expressions of sectarianism.

The permanent challenge of our humanity is to get and maintain the right balance between individual and community interests on the one hand and the overall common good on the other. To a large extent we have been able to make progress in this direction but there are still significant gaps and historical vestiges of sectarianism that need to be dealt with within countries and as the international community. This is achievable through an open minded approach guided by our innate human tendency.

Racism has been practiced for centuries when it was accepted as normal through slavery, colonialism and apartheid. “Good” people including some churches owned and profiteered from owning slaves. Colonialism and apartheid were equally exploitative and accepted as normal. Time came when they were rejected as abhorrent and were ended. The legacy of these practices dies hard and persists in many ways. Knowingly or unknowingly there are people who regard and treat black and colored people as less and not equal to white people. A celebrated illustration was the refusal by Adolf Hitler to award four gold medals to Jesse Owen, a black American athlete during the Berlin 1939 Olympics. These conscious and unconscious biases contribute to the disproportionately poor outcomes observed in the treatment of patients of color in some settings. They also impact relations with the justice system, police and act as barriers to professional career growth and power dynamics in society.

African and Asian countries are now post-colonial and independent and sit on the same table with other nations at the UN and other platforms but there are still power inequalities which affect trade and the economies, resulting in health disparities between nations. Sub-Saharan Africa lags far behind other regions of the world in health and development indices and we should seize the opportunity offered by the SDGs to end for example, avoidable maternal deaths, poverty and ignorance; the aspirations for ending colonialism. The High Income Countries should fulfill international commitments on development assistance and fair trade in order to reduce these global inequalities.

I have to refer to so many white people who as religious missionaries left the comfort of their homes, traveled to the colonies and provided quality education and humanitarian services to African and Asian people. I am a product of these exceptionally dedicated missionaries who educated so many of us who are now leaders in our respective countries. This was humanity at its best expressed through religious belief.

This discussion will be incomplete without reference to the harm done by sectarianism in our own African countries and communities that negatively impact our health systems, governance and health outcomes. Tribalism, nepotism, religious bias are at play in many African countries and societies. Our best professionals are kept away from occupying leadership roles in our institutions because of sectarianism as key jobs go to “who knows who” and not “who knows what”. My personal experience is that well-qualified highly performing public servants tend to serve the common good and are generally above sectarianism.

We must not tire of expressing our disgust for these vices in the same in way that the world has responded to the murder of Floyd George. Our humanity and common good tendencies will prevail and overcome and will progressively deliver social justice and equity that leave no one behind. Keep going. Victory is certain.

What do you all think?

Comments (3)

  • Austen Peter Davis

    Austen Peter Davis

    27 July 2020 at 12:19 |
    Dear Francis
    Firstly this is a social goal that goes ay beyond health - but in principle a serious national effort to UHC engages state and society in 81) seeing all citizens as equally entitled and (2) creating national systems to deliver within resource constraints the best and most equitable health assistance possible - both preventive and therapeutic. Creating broad based national adovacy for UHC and engaggin over the longer term in establishing UHC in African countries should take sectarianism head on.

    As an expat living in Norway I have been first amazed (and initially somewhat uncomfortable) and latterly impressed how the number 1 social and public goal is equity - in health, education, employment, social benefits etc.

    Coming form the anglo tradition I have worried about the lack of focus on excellence, performance and differential reward for performance but have gradually been won over.

    Best regards
    Austen Peter Davis
    Senior Adviser
    Department for Education and Global Health
    Global Health Section

    Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation
    Phone: +47 23 98 02 08
    Tel: +47 23 98 00 00
    Postal address: P.O. Box 8034 Dep, 0030 Oslo, Norway
    Office address: Bygdøy allé 2, 0257 Oslo, Norway
    Email: Austen.Peter.Davis@norad.no
  • Francis Omaswa

    Francis Omaswa

    27 July 2020 at 12:21 |
    Dear Austen,

    Thank you for your prompt rejoinder to this debate.

    You have hit the nail on the head. Equity everywhere as the number one social goal and pursued through excellence in performance and rewards as deserved.

    Norway and other Scandinavian countries are beacons and lead global quality of life rankings. How did they get there? What can we all learn from them?

    May be you can tell us more.

    Francis.
  • Austen Peter Davis

    Austen Peter Davis

    27 July 2020 at 12:29 |
    Dear Fracnis

    How did they get there - that is a larger sociopolitical debate.

    From my outsider perspective I think they have been blessed by:-
    i) not being too large
    ii) being very homogeneous
    iii) not having inherited elite structures that work to institutionalize differences
    iv) not being in the centre of political or economic development - following and learning
    v) having an agrarian and fishing past that very much emphasized collective survival over individual.

    These background characteristics mean not entirely easy for anyone to follow. But they have done a lot through choice.

    They have pioneered female equality - long before it as a majority view it was led by elites.
    They are pragmatic and rational - not ideological or grand.
    They are organized
    They have systems of justice that balance the rights of the weakest

    All these things can be created at country level - it requires national collective determination and I would add a degree of general education.
    As advocates for UHC I worry about constant advocacy for increased investment in health. I think health advocates must join forces with education advocates - fair jobs advocates and social security/protection advocates to create local movements for the betterment of society and increased investment in human capital - TOGETHER.


    Best regards
    Austen Peter Davis
    Senior Adviser
    Department for Education and Global Health
    Global Health Section

    Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation
    Phone: +47 23 98 02 08
    Tel: +47 23 98 00 00
    Postal address: P.O. Box 8034 Dep, 0030 Oslo, Norway
    Office address: Bygdøy allé 2, 0257 Oslo, Norway
    Email: Austen.Peter.Davis@norad.no

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest.